* Metadata of the article in the English version is available in full starting in 2016.

The model of standard-prescribed behavior of a rescuer in a situation of combat work

UDC 159.99
Authors Sergeev Vsevolod Nikolaevich, PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor
Abstract Purpose. The term of «standard-prescribed behavior (of a rescuer)» allowing to perform the functional analysis of rescuer’s actions in a situation of combat activity is presented.
Methods. General logical methods, conceptual analysis, functional analysis, methods of conceptual behavior analysis and experimental behavior analysis.
Findings. The standard-prescribed behavior is based on the so-called legal type of control. The mechanisms of modeling of required behavior through standard rules, ways of increasing its probability, tools of transfer of behavior in various situations are analyzed. The distinction of patterns of individual behavior, as well as its social forms facilitating the cumulative effect is made.
Application field of research. The model of standard-prescribed behavior of a rescuer can be used to organize the experimental study of battle training efficiency. Conclusion. The standard rules (Combat regulations, safety rules etc.) prescribe a particular order of actions in any situation. The standard regulation of behavior structurally reproduces the model of control of behavior due to existing consequences (i.e. includes guideline of conditions, expected behavior and its result) and can be analyzed with the help of the so-called ABC-scheme or formula SD-R-C.
Keywords rescuer, combat activity, combat training, standard prescribed behavior, legal control, rule-governed behavior, interlocked behavioral contingencies
  References
1. Boevoy ustav organov i podrazdeleniy po chrezvychaynym situatsiyam Respubliki Belarus' po organizatsii tusheniya pozharov [Combat regulations of bodies and divisions of the Ministry for emergency situations of the Republic of Belarus], available at: https://mchs.gov.by/zakonodatelstvo-v-sfere-deyatelnosti-mchs/npa-mchs/prikazy/ (accessed: March 24, 2019). (rus).
2. Todorov J.C. Laws and the Complex Control of Behavior. Behavior and Social Issues, 2005. Vol. 14. Pp. 86–91..
3. Todorov J.C. Behavioral analysis of non-experimental data associated with cultural practices. Behavior and Social Issues, 2009. Vol. 18. Pp. 10–14..
4. Glenn S. Contingencies and Metacontingencies: Relations Among Behavioral, Cultural, and Biological Evolution. Behavioral Ana1ysis of Societies and Cultura1 Practices. ed.by P.A. Lamal. New York: Hemisphere, 1991. Pp. 39–73..
5. Haynes S.N., O’Brien W.H. Functional Analysis in Behavior Therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 1990. Vol. 10. Pp. 649–668..
6. Sergeev V.N. Strategii issledovaniya lichnostnoy determinanty v bikhevioral'nykh podkhodakh: skhodstva i razlichiya [Strategies of studying of personal determination in behavioural approaches: Similarities and differences]. Sovremennye problemy psikhologii: interuniversity collection of scientific articles. Minsk: Belarusian State University, 2018. Pp. 223–235. (rus).
7. Glenn S., Malott M.E. Rules and Metacontingencies: Reply to Sandaker. Behavior and Social Issues, 2004. Vol. 13. Pp. 146..
8. Sergeev V.N. Verbal'nye pravila i ikh metodologicheskaya eksplikatsiya v kontseptsii radikal'nogo bikheviorizma [Verbal rules and their methodological explication in the concept of radical behaviorism]: Vesnіk Grodzenskaga dzyarzhaynaga ynіversіteta іmya Yankі Kupaly. Seryya 3. Fіlalogіya. Pedagogіka. Psіkhalogіya, 2017. Vol. 7, No. 3. Pp.135–141 (rus).
9. Sergeev V.N. Verbal'nye pravila i sledovanie im: k probleme sredovoy determinatsii povedeniya v sovremennom bikheviorizme [Verbal rules and rule-following as a problem in modern behaviorism]: Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya, 2018. No. 3. Pp. 83–94. (rus).
10. Skinner B.F. Nauka i chelovecheskoe povedenie [Science and human behavior]. Novosibirsk, 2017. 517 p. (rus).
11. Chris Ninness H. A., McCuller G., Ozenne L. School and behavioral psychology: applied research in human-computer interactions, functional assessment and treatment. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2000. 200 p..
12. Vargas E.A. «Verbal'noe povedenie» B.F. Skinnera: Vvedenie [«Verbal Behavior» of B. Skinner: Introdaction]: Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya, 2010. Vol. 4. Iss. 2. Pp. 56–78. (rus).
13. Glenn S. Rules as Environmental Events. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1987. No. 5. Pp. 29–32..
14. Todorov J.C. Conservation and transformation of cultural practices through contingencies and metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 2013. Vol. 22. Pp. 64–73..
15. Houmanfar R., Rodrigues N.J., Ward T.A. Emergence and metacontingency: points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 2010. No. 19. P. 78–103..
16. Pelaez M. Morality as a system of rule-governed behavior and empathy. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 8–14..
17. Sampaio A.A.S. et al. Exploring the Role of Verbal Behavior in A New Experimental Task for The Study of Metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 2013. Vol. 22. Pp. 87–101..
18. Robertson D.L., Pelaez M. Behavior Analytic Concepts and Change in a Large Metropolitan Research University: The Graduation Success Initiative. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2016. Vol. 36, Iss. 2–3. Pp. 123–153..DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2016.1200513.
19. Glenn S. On Rules and Rule-Governed Behavior: A Reply to Catania's Reply. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1989. No. 7. Pp. 51–52..
20. Maykl Dzh. Motivatsionnye usloviya. Prikladnoy analiz povedeniya [Motivational conditions. Applied behavior analysis]. Moscow: Praktika, 2016. Chapter 16. Pp. 412–432. (rus).
21. Miltenberger R.G. Behavior Modification. Principles and Procedures. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning, 2012. 554 p..
22. T?rneke N., Luciano C., Salas S.V. Rule-Governed Behavior and Psychological Problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2008. Vol. 8, No. 2. Pp. 141–156..
23. Zettle R.D., Young M.J. Rule-Following and Human Operant Responding: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1987. No. 5. Pp. 33–39..
24. Glenn S. Operant Contingencies and the Origin of Cultures. Behavior theory and philosophy. Ed. by K.A. Lattal, Ph.N. Chase. New York: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC, 2013. Pp. 223–242..
25. Glenn S. et al. Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 2016. No. 25. Pp. 11–27..
26. Vasconcelos I.G., Todorov J.C. Experimental Analysis of the Behavior of Persons in Groups: Selection of an Aggregate Product in a Metacontingency. Behavior and Social Issues, 2015. No. 24. Pp. 111–125..
27. Morford Z.H., Cihon T.M. Developing an experimental analysis of metacontingencies: considerations regarding cooperation in a four-person prisoner’s dilemma game. Behavior and Social Issues, 2013. No. 22. Pp. 5–20..
28. Borba A., Tourinho E., Glenn S. Effects of Cultural Consequences on the Interlocking Behavioral Contingencies of Ethical Self-Control. The Psychological Record, 2017. Vol. 67(3). Pp. 399–411..DOI: 10.1007/s40732-017-0231-6.
29. Borba A. et al. Effects of Exposure to Macrocontingencies in Isolation and Social Situations in the Production of Ethical Self-Control. Behavior and Social Issues, 2014. Vol. 23. Pp. 5–19..
30. Vasconcelos L.A. Exploring Macrocontingencies and Metacontingencies: Experimental and Non-experimental Contributions. Suma Psicol?gica. 2013. Vol. 20, No. 1. Pp. 31–43..
31. Hunter Ch.S. Analyzing Behavioral and Cultural Selection Contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicolog?a Volumen, 2012. Vol. 44, No. 1. Pp. 43–54..
32. Krispin J.V. What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 2016. No. 25. Pp. 28–41..
33. Smith G.S., Houmanfar R., Louis S.J. The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: from conceptualization to investigation. Behavior and Social Issues, 2011. No. 20. Pp. 122–146..
34. Tadaiesky L.T., Tourinho E.Z. Effects of Support Consequences and Cultural Consequences on the Selection of Interlocking Behavioral Contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicolog?a Volumen, 2012. Vol. 44. No. 1. Pp. 133–147..
35. Glenn S. Metacontingencies, Selection and OBM: Comments on «Emergence and Metacontingency». Behavior and Social Issues, 2010. Vol. 19. Pp. 79–85..
36. Vichi Ch., Pie Abib Andery A., Glenn S. Metacontingency Experiment: The Effects of Contingent Consequences on Patterns of Interlocking Contingencies of Reinforcement. Behavior and Social Issues, 2009. Vol. 18. Pp. 41–57..
37. Romek V.G. Povedencheskaya psikhoterapiya [Behavioral psychotherapy]: textbook. Moscow: Yurayt, 2018. 192 p. (rus).
38. Baumann U, Perrez M., Shul'te D. et al. Klinicheskaya psikhologiya [Clinical psychology]. Saint Petersburg: Piter buk, 2002. 1312 p. (rus).
39. Abbruzzese E., K?bler U. Verhaltensanalyse in der Verhaltenstherapie. Verhaltenstherapie, 2013. Vol. 23, No. 2. Pp. 108–116. (deu).
40. Spiegler M.D., Guevremont D.C. Contemporary Behavior Therapy, Fifth Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2010. 609 p..
41. Morrow J.E. Metacontingencies and Cultural Practices: A Review of Behavioral Analysis of Societies and Cultural Practices, edited by P.A. Lamal. The Behavior Analyst, 1992, Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 171–174..
42. Pravila organizatsii deyatel'nosti gazodymozashchitnoy sluzhby v organakh i podrazdeleniyakh po chrezvychaynym situatsiyam Respubliki Belarus' [Rules for organizing the activities of the gas and smoke protection service in the bodies and units for emergency situations of the Republic of Belarus], available at: https://mchs.gov.by/zakonodatelstvo-v-sfere-deyatelnosti-mchs/npa-mchs/prikazy/ (accessed: March 24, 2019). (rus).
43. Reis Soares P.F. dos et al. Effects of Verbal and Non-Verbal Cultural Consequences on Culturants. Behavior and Social Issues, 2018. Vol. 27. Pp. 31–46..
44. Todorov J.C. Schedules of Cultural Selection: Comments on «Emergence and Metacontingency». Behavior and Social Issues, 2010. Vol. 19. Pp. 111–114..